LOL- I laugh because that is the exact phrase that drove my dad so crazy with anger- His older sister would listen to him for a time and with a slow, measured sort of exasperated sigh say “Oh, Dave....”
I think I know exactly her frame of mind.
Stefan has been branding himself as almost the exact opposite of what I remember him to be. I feel somehow that he has betrayed his purpose by going back on Twitter. It is such a contrast from the time that I knew him- leading up to the 2020 election and all the media censorship that went with it. It was insane how the ban hammer came down on every single independent political commentator… An easy out of the entire facade for anyone with the requisite IQ.
But, he’s gone back. To me, he’s sold out. I’m not quite sure of my personal feelings about it. I know, because I was friends with them, that his inside circle has been pushing him to make more money. To go public again. To be in the spotlight and draw out all the resources he can. The same inner circle that kicked me out. That summarily ejected me on a moment’s whim and never looked back.
Huh.
While I am infinitely thankful for that, I feel sad about Stefan.
Stefan, or rather the very same inner circle of people, posted something on social media yesterday that really made it very clear that the forgoing is exactly what happened. It was that ring that expands into a globe-like shape and depicted all the major stars and constellations. The caption, “men create a universe for women” and I laughed, because; well it is true. Men do create for women. And then the next part “what equivalence have women created?”
And the smiled vanished. My laughter was gone. It was a cold, dark space that Stefan opened with that question. It is an inherent denial of the female being-ness. It is an insistence that if women do not offer up male value, in the same way that males do, then they are without value. That the Woman who is, who is a divine being-ness is valueless, because she inherently is not the doing-ness of man.
Concurrently, he ignores the OBVIOUS. Aren’t you a voluntarist, Stefan? Then, why in the Hell are you questioning this man’s assessment of the value of women? Wouldn’t you of all people as a voluntarist and free capitalist, know and respect that the man’s value for woman is reflected in what he does for her? Wouldn’t you recognize that if a voluntary exchange is made that value exchanged is subjective and always equal?
In some ways I can’t believe that he has become so stupid.
But, I know that it is not stupidity. It is a demon of anti-feminine. Is the anti-Christ, fundamentally. For Christ didn’t come here to do anything except fulfill the beingness which was already prophesized. He came to be. Which is a fundamentally feminine energy, of course.
Don’t get me wrong about Christ; he is a non-gendered Being of the Cosmos, or rather, a perfect union of both genders. Christ came to do through being- the perfect wholeness encompassing Masculine doing and Feminine being. Christ is a transcendental being far surpassing these energies and in fact, is part of the creative forces of those energies.
What I mean about the anti-Christ being ant-feminine is that it is inherently a violent tearing apart of the whole union of Christ energies. It rips the Masculine from the Feminine and creates a tension of rivalry- chooses favorites and scape-goats and runs campaigns of fear ignorance, diversion, and inversion. Instead of the Masculine and Feminine in divine union creating a transcendental third, a trinity; the anti-Christ rips them apart and forms the inversion of a Holy Trinity to an Unholy victim-perpetrator-savior complex.
Anyways. I feel better after having written this about it. I want to ask Stefan if he thought of that post. I wonder if he observes a lack of value in the being-ness of his own daughter, or wife. And, if not, then why he would promulgate such destructive discourse and energy to the rest of humanity.
Oh, Stefan. I feel so brokenhearted. I saw you as a father-figure. But no more.
Loading comments...