It’s Time to End ‘Rape Culture’ Hysteria in Sane Wailings

  • March 22, 2014, 5:27 p.m.
  • |
  • Public

This is a great editorial about the hysteria about 'rape culture'.

It points out a huge problem concerning today's feminism: it's no longer concerned about equal rights. 21st Century Feminism seems to now about removing all social responsibility/accountability from women. Not only is there the real issue of false reporting but media reporting is an even bigger problem. They toss around stats that have been greatly skewed by gender-biased organizations.

Tossing around generalizations and accusing a body of people of doing something that is only being done by a very, very small portion of the public is irresponsible and shameful. "Culture" implies that this thinking is shared by society. In this case, it is not. That is what Caroline Kitchen is getting at. The term "rape culture" is unnecessarily lumping all people together and this is not a helpful label at all.

Rape Culture has literally become the next hysteria much like the Salem Witch Hunt, McCarthy's Red Scare and the Satanism Scare of the 80s.

The facts are this:

1) Criminals who commit rape need to and deserve to be thrown in jail.

2) Teens in college need to exercise self control and not copulate while drunk and regret it later -- and that applies to both genders!

3) People, regardless of gender, need to realize if they dress provocatively and put themselves out there as an object to be admired, then some idiots may just treat them as such.

4) Everyone should learn a little self defense and understand that there''s value in presenting oneself in a dignified fashion.

So read the article and tell me what you think.

Peter




It’s Time to End ‘Rape Culture’ Hysteria

Written by Caroline Kitchens

The nation's largest and most influential anti-sexual-violence organization is rejecting the idea that culture — as opposed to the actions of individuals — is responsible for rape.

“Rape is as American as apple pie,” says blogger Jessica Valenti. She and her sisters-in-arms describe our society as a “rape culture” where violence against women is so normal, it’s almost invisible. Films, magazines, fashion, books, music, humor, even Barbie — according to the activists — cooperate in conveying the message that women are there to be used, abused, and exploited. Recently, rape culture theory has migrated from the lonely corners of the feminist blogosphere into the mainstream. In January, the White House asserted that we need to combat campus rape by “[changing] a culture of passivity and tolerance in this country, which too often allows this type of violence to persist.”

Tolerance for rape? Rape is a horrific crime and rapists are despised. We have strict laws that Americans want to see enforced. Though rape is certainly a serious problem, there’s no evidence that it’s considered a cultural norm. Twenty-first century America does not have a rape culture; what we have is an out-of-control lobby leading the public and our educational and political leaders down the wrong path. Rape culture theory is doing little to help victims, but its power to poison the minds of young women and lead to hostile environments for innocent males is immense.

On college campuses, obsession with eliminating “rape culture” has led to censorship and hysteria. At Boston University, student activists launched a petition demanding the cancellation of a Robin Thicke concert, because the lyrics of his hit song “Blurred Lines” allegedly celebrate “systemic patriarchy and sexual oppression.” (The lyrics may not exactly be pleasant to many women, but song lyrics don’t turn men into rapists. Yet, ludicrously, the song has already been banned at more than 20 British universities.) Activists at Wellesley recently demanded that administrators remove a statue of a sleepwalking man: The image of a nearly naked male could “trigger” memories of sexual assault for victims. Meanwhile, a growing number of young men find themselves charged with rape, named publicly, and brought before campus judicial panels informed by rape culture theory. In such courts, due process is practically non-existent: Guilty because accused.

Rape culture theorists dismiss critics who bring up examples of hysteria and false accusations as “rape denialists” and “rape apologists.” To even suggest that false accusations occur, according to activists, is to engage in “victim blaming.” But now, rape culturalists are confronting a formidable critic that even they will find hard to dismiss.

RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network) is America’s largest and most influential anti-sexual violence organization. It’s the leading voice for sexual assault victim advocacy. Indeed, rape culture activists routinely cite the authority of RAINN to make their case. But in RAINN’s recent recommendations to the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault, it repudiates the rhetoric of the anti “rape culture” movement:

"In the last few years, there has been an unfortunate trend towards blaming “rape culture” for the extensive problem of sexual violence on campus. While it is helpful to point out the systemic barriers to addressing the problem, it is important not to lose sight of a simple fact: Rape is caused not by cultural factors but by the conscious decisions, of a small percentage of the community, to commit a violent crime."

RAINN urges the White House to “remain focused on the true cause of the problem” and suggests a three-pronged approach for combating rape: empowering community members through bystander intervention education, using “risk-reduction messaging” to encourage students to increase their personal safety, and promoting clearer education on “where the ‘consent line’ is.” It also asserts that we should treat rape like the serious crime it is by giving power to trained law enforcement rather than internal campus judicial boards.

RAINN is especially critical of the idea that we need to focus on teaching men not to rape — the hallmark of rape culture activism. Since rape exists because our culture condones and normalizes it, activists say, we can end the epidemic of sexual violence only by teaching boys not to rape.

No one would deny that we should teach boys to respect women. But by and large, this is already happening. By the time men reach college, RAINN explains, “most students have been exposed to 18 years of prevention messages, in one form or another.” The vast majority of men absorbs these messages and views rape as the horrific crime that it is. So efforts to address rape need to focus on the very small portion of the population that “has proven itself immune to years of prevention messages.” They should not vilify the average guy.

By blaming so-called rape culture, we implicate all men in a social atrocity, trivialize the experiences of survivors, and deflect blame from the rapists truly responsible for sexual violence. RAINN explains that the trend of focusing on rape culture “has the paradoxical effect of making it harder to stop sexual violence, since it removes the focus from the individual at fault, and seemingly mitigates personal responsibility for his or her own actions.”

Moral panic over “rape culture” helps no one — least of all, survivors of sexual assault. College leaders, women’s groups, and the White House have a choice. They can side with the thought police of the feminist blogosphere who are declaring war on Robin Thicke, the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition, male statues, and Barbie. Or, they can listen to the sane counsel of RAINN.


Pretend Mulling March 22, 2014

I agree with most of this, but I have a problem with the clothing statement. I don't necessarily disagree with it, but to me, it sounds a little too close to "clothes turn people into rapists", which (a) isn't true in the slightest and (b) further implicates innocent men. Personally, I'm not a skirt-wearer (no reason except I just don't wear them), but I've been cat-called for wearing just jeans, a tee shirt, a hoodie, and sneakers, which is about as "alluring" as a burlap sack. I think the clothes aspect needs to be dropped from the argument entirely. Clothes don't determine a crime; the crime committed determines the crime.

Peter_24601 Pretend Mulling ⋅ March 22, 2014

Mulling, I agree with you to a point. There is such thing as a good skirt and a very bad skirt just as much as there is such a thing as good blue jeans and very trashy bluejeans. The point being made was if you don't respect yourself and treat yourself as an object to be admired... you can't be shocked when others treat you that way too. I never said it was right, I'm just stating that it's completely avoidable by just using a little common sense.

Toggled March 22, 2014

Like the above noter I disagree with the clothes comment. I can think of numerous instances of receiving unwanted attention and none were when I was drunk or wearing anything remotely provactive. Once in a supermarket wearing a high necked , knee length baggy dress with leggings I was followed out of the store, through the shopping centre by a man who had been behind me in the queue at the supermarket who then felt it was okay to grope me and tell me that he had enjoyed watching me bend over my trolley, I was scared to go home in case he continued to follow me. Numerous incidents on public transport wearing work clothing and the list goes on and on. I keep myself safe and avoid situations where I could be vulnerable and whilst that is the reality of life it shouldn't be so. You should be able to have a drink too many and not be taken advantage of, it doesn't make it any more my fault if someone does. Reducing the amount of people in a vulnerable position does not alter the disposition of rapist, it makes it harder to find someone to take advantage of but does not address the problem. I don't think any one with half a brain would suggest that Robin Thicke's song actually makes someone become a rapist but I do believe it is another small contribution to some music, film, tv, advertising etc etc that gives an impression of women being sexual objects who say no when they mean yes

Peter_24601 Toggled ⋅ March 22, 2014

Toggled, while I get the point you're trying to make... no matter what the crime in question is, we shouldn't avoid making it harder to commit crimes just because some people will do it anyway. Bartenders are told to monitor how much a person drinks and is even asked to take keys away to stop people from driving under the influence. Cops are out on the streets setting up road blocks to specifically reduce the amount of people who are vulnerable to becoming victims of drunk drivers. We make efforts to reduce crime all the time, but here it's not fair?

Asking women to not dress poorly is like telling someone to not enter Yankee Stadium with a Red Sox jersey on. We know you're in potential danger but you're calling us sexist for being concerned about your safety.

I agree that the problem should be addressed on numerous fronts, but precautions and common sense should be applied where ever possible or we're just not making a genuine effort to prevent assaults.

Deleted user March 23, 2014

Too true, sadly. At my college I sadly see this sort of thing more than I'd like to admit. You just have to hope that truth gets through to stubborn heads.

Deleted user April 16, 2014

Was it also time to end your PB? :(

Peter_24601 Deleted user ⋅ April 22, 2014

Not yet, I've just been super busy with writing projects.

Sorry,

You must be logged in to comment. Please sign in or join Prosebox to leave a comment.