Free Speach? in Voices Windward

If you will “defend to the death” the rights for someone to use propoganda to advocate an enforced heirarchial social order and promotes the wholesale murder of those not deemed eugenically pure enough, I think maybe you want to assess that malfunction.

The need for closed societies and rigid social structures may be honestly wanted by some, and there are many communities where people with these inclinations live, with no harm done to the world. These themselves do not make “facism”, it’s when you impose that order outwardly in the expansionistic model we’ve seen so much using biogotry to divide the lower orders to consolidate your power base, usually using violence.

See violence is a tool, just as any other. It may not be pleasent, it may not be for everyone, but it is there, and we should not be timid to defend our communities with it’s use. particularly when said facists are busy commiting horrific acts of violence and directly influencing others to commit atrocities using religious passions as the catalyst with the “free speach” you want to defend so much.

… Then again I’m equally dismissive of “NO PLATFORMING”… becuase society and social change doesn’t fit with handy little absolutes guys.